A question for it, to nurse mommies on the benefits of breastmilk?

We all know that they are numerous. But I saw SOOOO, the many wife on Y!A the truth over breastmilk generously lay out. I have claims gek about the benefitsümmert, that I have LOL literally, \'d with, and I am a major advocate for care. Therefore what is, HER/ITS/THEIR reaction, if you a claim about breastmilk kput back ümmern that certainly becomes you aren\'t from science?

Additional details

Ethyl, all those matters, that you mentioned, are true or at least believable, estrogen therefore causes density risk for hip breaks osteoporosis/osteopenia-Risiko through it, and obviously there are studies on it, that influences the heart health of mommy, but you cannot tell me that you obviously didn\'t see any silly claims here, that I saw so much.

2

For K:

Examples:
Antibody answer to vaccine is higher, this doesn\'t make any scientific sense at all to me,

Protection against eczema, except if you give to early baby food, but then, it is no "benefit" of nursing, it is a deterrence, in order to start too early solids,

Did risk of the leukemia decrease, this is the one, that got me,...?!?!?

I saw others besides it, can only this from the top of my head reminds.

Don\'t get any injustice for me, I still nurse my child with 18 months, but it annoys me, if I stupid stuff like the above mentioned, this is posted, sees.

2

Granola-Mama, you can find one single study, that says everything,; it is dangerous to take one single study of gospel. All studies have mistakes. None this above erwenough of literature, that is, was confirmed ähnten matters why Sie\'d never finds a medical pro, who does those claims.

Antibodyniveaus too hib is not, you necessarily do to improved vaccine answer. More probably directly from the milk even. One from both way, the literature here is so spärlich, that to do the claim, is silly.


by two, boys are a joy!

Best answer chosen by Asker

The reason, that they say, that less probably women, who nurse, are to be neglected her/its/their children, because one is because of the hormones, that are freed. also, studies show, thereß this more more trained the woman, the more probably she/it, to nurse, is. Es\'s only a study and doesn\'t make any havee in order to do very much with the milk. I never has go really wide from everythingört, got, most of them have any reason why they say it. it could be the milk not only social backgroung for the parents

Asker \'s Rating:

Asker \'s Comment:

"it could be the milk not only social backgroung for the parents"
I suspect that this is true not only in the study prejudices, but also in the prejudices of the people on Y!A, that lays out the truth generously.

Save to! ! RSS

Other Answers (5)

through???? xí?? \'s... y?? 7. December? Now, I nurse. But as soon as I read this supposedly, M areütter that nurses less PROBABLY, to neglect her/its/their children. I think this is kinda-Extrem, because I land, this thinks \'t nothing, with M, hasütter-Fütterungsformel, to do, and neglecting of her/its/their babies. But over health benefits, like higher IQS, I believe one little one little, but I, that was only on formula, know people very cleverly.

Actually, I didn\'t see any matter of Ethel. I am a scientist, and I read the documents, w,ährend it doubts with some benefits to the infant healthwise the benefits of mommy gives, is innumerable and often is overlooked. As of sinking cholesterol levels, that are good, because they go quite highly in pregnancy, is her/its/their occurrence of the Art IIE to lower diabetes, important if lowers her/its/their occurrence of the breast cancer es\'s sees foolishly so widespread nowadays maybe to lower her/its/their occurrence of hip break postmenopausal, if she/it ouchßer jeez fertile is, I want my hips, that work after menopause.

You/they are allowed to LOL, but is not given you rooms in science maybe, I don\'t know. What I see a bu++load of the data, points f at itür entire health hin\'s the best matter.

from HondaRGu... I dont knows. All i weiß, that the Wegsachen are worked for me. I can tell you, thereß i many Probleme-Brustfütterung had. But it loved i at the same time. My son only always is two times sick and he/it gewesen\'s 2. Götter honest truth. it it glättet never, started a fever even the two times, that he/it was sick. Therefore, the one believes i thereover helping of her/its/their immune system. I weiß also that, while i was, itself Brustfütterung-i at the lowest weight i did, ever was by 15 pounds. This thereover hated single part i was, as i first began breast feeding, it killed me because it gave me contraction like pains almost one week long, every time if would feed him/it i!

through K - "claims about the benefits, that I have LOL literally on that occasion,"

How? I have some, but she/it, here and there gesehen\'wieder in general discarded only a liner of non-parents, the only zufällig told to fall in Newborn & baby somebody, that they learned only in health class, that these nursed babies don\'t get any colic.

from GranolaM.... a study, that found, that a reduced risk of the leukemia, that was associated with nursing, was published in the magazine of the American Cancer institutes in 1999.

A study, that joined, nursing to elevated immunity answer on the Hib vacciene, 1990 were published in the lancet.

A study, that closed, that infant formula increased, an infant\'s likelihood became, the atopic dermatitis (eczema) had, publishes 2007 in the magazine Pediatrics.

Still something?

Source(s,:

/ cgi/conte.

/ cg.

/ science?_ob.