Abortion and feminism, why the fetus fate be both parents\' the decision of mother responsibility during child?

I asked about it why a woman can force the man to be a father while the man cannot force her/it/them become to be a mother and one of the answerer, who are called, said "True Britt",:

"Nobody forces a man to be a father, he/it meets to have the decision, sex and reception on the risk. He/it doesn\'t becomes pregnant, the woman does. If a man an abortion on his/its Körper can get, he/it can demand equal control of his/its body. And ich\'ll lowermostützt him/it.

You/they are sufficiently old in order to have sex, you are sufficiently old in order to know the possible consequences and the risks. If you and it go ahead doesn, \'t-Gehen, that to plan gewährt, you have to only accuse itself/themselves."


Do you want so that a man handles the child\'s responsibility because he/it chose to have sex? But this comes no more against you as against me. A woman has more elections and more methods of Empfängnisverhütung and the woman must handle these means, if a man then must handle the consequences of his/its election, also the consequences. I don\'t have any Zögern, to now say, that the abortion must be prevented, while this never means, that a woman doesn\'t have any reproductive right, because she/it has more contraception methods than men. Hinzugefshe/it doesn\'t have to get any paid pregnancy permission ügt to it, knew she/it, if she/it had sex, would become she/it pregnant, and maybe this influences her/its/their work. It only is, thereß simply

And if a Mrs. Recht has for her to break off, she/it should have also responsibility to her/its/their fetus. If she/it too much drunk or während pregnancy and the child too much smoked, then was damaged because of him/it, that must handle her/it/them also the consequences, because she/it knew the risks. You/they muß are locked up if her/its/their fetus damages because of bad health habits to lives awakened.

And as soon as the man is the person, who then becomes pregnant, maybe we apply the same rule against men! And I know this Manndie tr \'s-Gesundheitägt to the fetus health with, but the health of woman has much more effect. Hinzugefa woman must handle the duty ügt to this to nurse the child and must need to ask for same payment for a breast provider, she/it must handle the consequences of her/its/their election!


A person named answered "Judy & Charlie"

"If a man doesn\'t wish to be part of a paternity suit, he/it must only his/its pants anbehalten. He/it cannot be forced his/its pants into reception against his/its will away. And das\'s, why you don\'t force any woman können, to become a mother against her/its/their will. On the end, company doesn\'t wants to be worthwhile too lowermostützen, must your from spring, because the 2 people, who did the child, it should support or it for adoption should give away,: simply."

Actually the answer is they for resembling, but in the end, she/it said, that they must pay both to child support, and this is a misleading idea. Because to have sex, no Einverst,this be ändnis in order to do a baby against human right, because the man didn\'t choose, you have this the baby with why the woman takes the decision ALONE, but then asks about SHARED responsibility?

It is her/its/their body right? My. . . My. . . My

But actually the fetus body of HER/ITS/THEIR CHOICE is composed by his/its mother\'s body. Therefore if it, that the child is creature of the woman, wants biologically nehmen\'s-Körper, so that she/it doesn\'t have to ask for child support! But if we want to say one, the H carried \'s-Chromosomeälfte the genes for the fetus, whom we must hold for same rights over this child, with while the current rules want 100 percent of responsibility for non-marriage father, while they give to him/it rights zero to see the child, except if he/it applies in a court, or takes, you mother the permission. But why does the permission mother? why even the mother takes the care automatically, ouchßer if the man gets court order? It muß automatic common care is, except if we get a court order,

In other words my body? My election alone, lavatory ion or NOT? My responsibility alone, Kinderunterstützung,

through tasha w

Best answer chosen by Asker

Let begun me through the say, that I am for election.

Now....

Tru Brit is you so fully from shit.

In your own words, you say, quoted in the question, that, if a woman becomes pregnant, it the man\'s blame is. , Thereß if he/it wants to accept the role of the parent didn\'t, she/it should not have any sex. O.o

Do you indicate so that she/it was raped? Thereß she/it also no election, to have sex, did? Why places auf\'t that the same rules apply to women? If she/it is not willing to be a parent, then she/it shouldnläßt \'t sex she/it either should? If to use Sie\'wieder of going, thereß type of out-of-date logic him/it then at least through it follows and it to both sexes applies, or you only finish to look like an intellectual fool.

And with which you joke this can "nobody to be force a man, a father" bit? Es\'s a clever spin on Wörtern. No, you können\'t forces a man to be a father, but you can force him/it financially to be a parent with legal duties and expectations, that were not his/its election either. And no, a man doesn\'t can any abortion on his/its Körper has, but I would advocate that he/it could have on his/its wallet one. Women get "physically caught from pregnancy and we have a Lösung to it for women, that no mothers his/its wants, birth control, adoption, abortion. Männer is caught financially, and there is not any solution to him/it, that is favorable for the man, who wants to be no father. He/it muß pay, he/it must be a father, who depends on the decision, who is done by the woman. Männer doesn\'t have any refuge, that not on him/it dependent which the pregnant woman decides is.

As far as -
"You/they are not alone in your responsibility for a man, either financial or tutelary. The woman normally takes the Löwen an\'s-Anteil."
Maybe, but that only is IF she/it doesn\'t choose any abortion. Again, he/it is abh after her/its/their electionängig.

And really? If a man can go from him/it away, wählt? Do you mean all these laws to pursue deadbeat daddies, is a fiction of our collective imagination? Really? ICH\'m, that doesn\'t say, thereß men, who decided having, to commit to them, of her/its/their children went away, should be held not responsibly, but for those, that didn\'t want to be fathers of the beginning, this in with them was put together, and labeled, deadbeat daddies are stupid. Männer können\'t goes only away so to say, either is incredibly naive or an outright lie.

The majority of women, the abortions therefore with the request of the men has done? Wow, what für a sh*tty-Meinung of the women, who have you Tru Brit. We are unfähig from it, to make decisions against our bodies? Let\'s allow it Männern, when/if, to decide, we should become mothers?

Is this not, the exact matter feminism complained on the other hand?



Asker, to your question, idk, if there is a good answer. Given me allem\'ve said above, I believe, thereß it primarily irrefutable is. Es\'s, that always goes, to be unfair. Das\'s, why I an Anhis änger financial abortion for men. Es\'s, that the single Wegmänner reproductive rights at all will get.

Asker \'s Rating:

Asker \'s Comment:

Hello! It is good, in this time, the REAL Fairne,ß assumes to see a woman, as soon as it to pregnancy comes,

Save to! ! RSS

Other Answers (14)

what told you to Because, is through It that the fetus is in the woman\'s body. Think, thereß only, because a man has sex with a woman, and does she/it make pregnant that he/it can force her/it/them to carry birth to a baby and to give? Das\'s barbaric.

from HeyHun Kein argument here... irresponsible behavior breeds irresponsible actions. Mietfristen-Anfang of starting no person used Empfängnisverhütung. If adjournment right is for her/it/them "No", is be "no"....

from Popeye the lack of the feminist, to have about her/its/their cake, and, to eat it also!

through greasy, you slosh, pistol fanatic beat me to it. And you get a star. Good work.

from Sigil True Brits, argument is wrong, men often are forced, fathers, that, for what she/it makes covered sex and paternity, to be.

The second answer as you pointed it out, is hypocritical.

These people take at the moment the best which position job for her/it/them out one, that mans, rights are no consideration of them and you have this the other POV conceptualising a harsh tense.


True brit, paternity is forced by lies over birth control, the child supports system, child agriculture for profit, paternity deceit and real accidents.

through Doktor-M with it she/it this says, can men think, however, whether to have sex or not and they are not closed the election and it, is her/its/their responsibility women, however, somehow, not get you to choose to have sex and possibly be responsible?


She/it sounds like a misogynist.

through pistol fanatics, It of the same ole is same ole [\'women and only women, elections should have, but men should carry all the responsibilities\', must] Feminist interior hypocrisy. Feminists despise the idea of the women, that für her/its/their actions responsibly is held, simply.

You/they essentially say that women are unripe children, that not capable for being responsible, is.

through Joe Bloggs True, Brit is a feminist.

Feminists want rights to women and responsibilities for men. This is the \'right\' evidenced in her/its/their answers to women, who have, a man\'s child too töten, but a man must for her/its/their decision to have, is done financially responsibly, or not, the child.


Feminism is sexism. Simply dafür.

from Rhodanth.... men don\'t bring little to any election if it occurs. If a type wants to be a father doesn\'t, that he/it only in it wlocally it can be forced because he/it had sex. Even if in advance he/it with the woman about not lacking children spoke, she/it can still alter her/its/their opinion if she/it should become pregnant and forces him/it to be a daddy. ZumZum resemble time, if he/it wanted his/its child, she/it could ignore him/it and could break it off. I am correct in agreement, es\'s unfair.

from George M?Casland Do, you don\'t forget, this also is, why they created the sure harbor laws, because they also are willing to kill her/it/them later, sooner than you, they give to a father and face the possibility you to pay child support.


from Stefanie de GreenEyed Pefanie Pr.... knows Ya, if a woman becomes pregnant, shrinks physically her/its/their brain in the first 6 months. Then, new neural paths are done and manage irrevocable Alterations of her/its/their brain and this she/it is.
Is so alone sufficiently uncanny not to mention the hormonal alterations.

Therefore, pregnancy changes a woman eternally, regardless of, whether she/it lifts or the child breaks off or it gives up for abortion. It also is majorly, that on the Körper and the mind taxes, and it has some health risks, it could ruin a quantity of her/its/their plans and through it possibly her/its/their life.

I say this should her/its/their a special opinion of the matter gives...

I agree that it should be possible to lock up women for neglect/abuse if she/it makes unhealthy matters unambiguous, while pregnant, ie. drinking/smoking/drug mißbraucht.
In our country, where husbands must pay childsupport, we don\'t have do friends a skillful order, except if they sign a form, that boasts, they are the father, you können\'t forces a paternity examination. I am not correct him/it, him/it, sch zu\'sön, if a woman can fool a man, and still brand this he/it payment.
Also, in my country, if the daddy cannot pay the childsupport, they send him/it to prison or nothing. You/they veralters the quantity, that he/it must pay granting to his/its income, plus the government helps from, if the mother is very poor.

from Brittny Wrong! I love, like people says können, "if u Geschlecht-u-kno has, the consequences correct!" However this also means, that the woman should know also the consequences, therefore, if a Mrs. Geschlecht has, who gets n pregnant, but she/it can from the consequences, parent through getting simply an abortion, to be, comes out easily because they then don\'t want you it", a man should be capable to come out even if! As well as Männer also as women either should refrain from sex or should use protection, if they land, wants a child \'t. This is what we like to call, "Ignorance"

through Greens parties of looked at angel Engelsfeministin, you actually believe whether a man doesn\'t want any children that he/it should not have any sex,..., but that all women have the right to have sex, if they, because they never must be responsible for the life, want to create her/it/them, if they become pregnant. it is double morals the whole way... she/it stands like vollständige idiots and opinion there if Männerdon\'t wants, babied covers her/its/their junk or doesn\'t have any sex... besides those same women will have unprotected sex from using birth control as well and if they become pregnant from it, that they will either have the child, and forces the man, whom they stumbled uglies with it, in order to pay 18 years long child support or they will murder the child! Feminist is only responsibly dafür, pregnant, to become, if it is convenient for them,...

Feminist doesn\'t give any flying fart in hell over the rights of men.... of universe, of which they take care, is capable to do, wish her/it/them her/its/their bodies with what,... and if they don\'t want to prevent any pregnancy, before it through good heavens happens, they are no gonna! cause, it is her/its/their right to stop the pregnancy after the fact,... feminists built an extension so disrespectfully from human life, thereß it pathetic is,..., but they still expect that men are responsible for always child, born.... cause, that the easiest way to guarantee, is that makes her/it/them a man with something!
Men NEVER trust a woman! schützen you itself before it, pregnant a woman wants you to do, until you are with the one, children with it! cause too much, will use a man through a child instead of leaving her/it/them one $$and bringing in of her own damn money....

from true blue Brit

Because of his/its low class hid answer

A woman gets done with it. She/it either has an abortion, or she/it doesn\'t do.
Most women, the abortions therefore with the request of her/its/their partner has done.
You/they are not alone in your responsibility for a man, either financial or tutelary. The woman normally takes the Löwen an\'s-Anteil.
Women must be pregnant, you carry the baby, you go through the work, the child, that revolts much more for it, for 18 years.
Or they must go other through an abortion, that is no picnic, through jedermanns standards.
If you must do that, you come and pour out you.

Laboratory technically, how do you" force "a man to be a father? It is vollständig his/its decision, to be involved at his/its child, s-Leben. he/it can go away, if he/it so wünscht.
You/they can force a man to pay child support, that is true, although much escape taxes this fiddles from applying, work loses and lives on new friend, and so on and so on